Evaluating and Recommending Effective Food Waste Reduction Practices with the Help of Existing Supply Chain Strategies
This study intends to investigate efficient methods for reducing food
waste in the global food business and assess how well they are applied
throughout the supply chain. The study creates a thorough understanding of food
waste reduction strategies and practises through the use of a qualitative
methodology and thematic analysis of secondary data from several research
databases. The research revealed two key themes. The first subject highlights
actions performed by stakeholders including food growers, manufacturers,
retailers, and policymakers and focuses on the adoption and implementation of
efforts to reduce food waste. The significance of sustainable practises in the
food sector is further reinforced by collaborative projects and industry-wide
agreements. The second theme focuses on consumer behaviour and awareness with
regard to reducing food waste. Online platforms, social media, and influencers
are driving this increase in consumer awareness. Additionally, the study
emphasises the value of sophisticated monitoring, data analytics, traceability,
and transparency in lowering food waste. The identification of essential
strategies for reducing food loss included inventory management, demand
forecasting, cold chain management, quality control, and supply chain
complexity and coordination. The study offers useful information for reducing
food waste in the food business in a sustainable and ethical manner.
List
of tables:
Table
1: frequency table for themes of RQ 1 39
Table
2: frequency table for themes of RQ 2 41
Table
3: frequency table for themes of RQ 3 44
Table
4: frequency table for themes of RQ 4 47
Table
5: frequency table for themes of RQ 5 51
List
of figures:
Figure 1: Sustainable
supply chain management 14
Figure 2: Strategy
and organizational culture 16
Figure 3: Tripple
bottom line theoretical concept 18
Figure 4:
triple bottom line constituents 19
Figure 5: Saunder
research onion model 28
Figure 6:
Graph for table 1 39
Figure 7:
Graph for table 2 42
Figure 8:
Graph for table 3 45
Figure 9:
Graph for table 4 48
Figure 10:
Graph for table 5 51
Table of Contents
1.5 Overview of
Research Methodology
2.1 Sustainable Supply Chain
Management (SSCM)
2.1.1 Definition and Principles of
SSCM
2.1.2 SSCM’s Contribution to
Reducing Food Waste
2.2 Important SSCM concepts and
frameworks Relevant to Reducing Food Waste
2.3.1 Application of TBL in
Relation to Reducing Food Waste
2.3.2 Advantages and Difficulties
of Using a TBL Approach:
2.4 Food waste reduction practices:
2.6 Identified gap in literature:
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
Recommendations
for Additional Study:
Chapter 1: Introduction
A
global issue that has been faced by the world and has implications on the
environment, as well as the economy, is food waste. A huge quantity of food has
been wasted in the food supply chain as from the production to the consumption
process there are different stages at which food is wasted having detrimental
effects (Ojha et al, 2020). The unnecessary expenditure has been increased by
the food waste which needs to decrease profit for the businesses but also
impact environmental sustainability leading toward food insecurity. According
to the research, about one-third of the food produced in the world has been
lost or wasted globally, which is equal to 1.3 billion metric tons of food
(Greenly, 2023). The figure shows the alarming situation for the sustainability
of the food industry as well as its efficiency.
1.1 Background of Research
The
existing supply chain strategies need to be evaluated and used to develop
effective food waste reduction practices as the need of the hour to address the
issue of food wastage at the global level. For the production of food,
different resources are used such as land, water, and energy which are all
wasted as the food has been discarded (Bhargava, 2020). Food waste has been a
potent source of greenhouse gas which is leading to climate change. Methane has
been released by the decomposition of food waste which resulted in the release
of greenhouse gas by the landfills. The disposal of food is not carried out
properly which leads to the depletion of resources affecting the sustainability
of the ecosystem by the loss of biodiversity. It has been found that there is
greater water consumption and uses of land with reduced productivity or
availability of food through ineffective food waste practices. Therefore, it is
important to address the issue of food wastage as it is also linked with
environmental sustainability.
For
businesses and consumer, the economic consequences of food waste are found to
be immense as the cost has been associated with the production and processing
of food. Wastage of food has resulted in financial loss not only to the
businesses but also increase in price for the consumer (Ali, 2019). Potential
revenue opportunities have been lost by the businesses which increase the
burden on the consumer in the form of spike in prices. The ripple effect has
been found throughout the supply chain by the insufficient food supply chain
which resulted in consequences for the farmers, retailers, traders as well as
consumers affecting the economic sustainability of the industry (Schanes, Dobernig, & Gözet, 2018).
Third-world
countries are facing food shortages where people are losing their lives because
of hunger and food insecurity. People even do not have access to nutritious
food while on the other hand, a significant amount of edible food has been
wasted (Annosi,
Brunetta, Bimbo, & Kostoula, 2021). Food security would be installed among the people by
providing them with valuable resources and reducing food waste. As per the
sustainable development goal provided by the United Nations, it is necessary
for all nations and businesses to consider zero poverty and hunger in the
world. A substantial amount of food has been wasted all across the world while
millions of people are deprived of food which is not ethically acceptable (Mak,
2020). There is a need to introduce the equitable distribution of food and the
proper utilization of resources so that efficiency would be achieved in
providing nutritional food to the greater population. Food insecurity has been
addressed by redirecting food to those who are in need of it rather than
wasting it.
Considering
the widespread impact of food waste in different aspects of life, it is
important to carry out the evaluation of existing food waste reduction
practices and develop effective ones (Bosona, & Gebresenbet, 2018). There is a need to evaluate the
supply chain strategies that aim towards optimizing production with improved
storage practices for food safety and utilization of innovative technology to
reduce food waste (Read, 2020). Reducing food waste will increase the
sustainability of the environment as well as the food industry. Financial
losses and the adverse economic impact that has been faced by the community and
businesses due to food waste would also be reduced.
1.2 Research Question:
·
How the modern global food industry is practicing food waste
reduction practices?
·
Why it is essential for the food industry to effectively
implement food waste reduction practices?
·
How the food waste reduction practices can be enhanced by
the utilization of technology and innovation?
·
What are the major challenges that are currently faced by
the food industry for the effective implementation of reduction practices for
food waste?
·
How effective supply chain strategies would be utilized for
the reduction of food waste and how they can be integrated with business
operations?
1.3 Research Aim:
The
purpose of the research is to evaluate the existing supply chain strategies
that will be utilized to design effective food waste reduction practices and
recommend the best so that poverty would be reduced and the sustainability of
the food industry will be enhanced.
1.4 Research Objective
● To identify effective food waste
reduction practices to broaden the understanding of their importance in the
global food industry
● To carry out an evaluation of the
currently existing food waste reduction practices in the food supply chain
● To recommend the utilization of
technology to bring innovation in the supply chain in the food industry for the
food waste reduction
● To carry out an evaluation for
effective supply chain strategies that will reduce food waste and enhance the
existing operation.
1.5 Overview of Research Methodology
A
qualitative approach will be utilized for the research in which the secondary
data will be collected and analysed by the thematic approach. Comprehensive
understanding has been developed through the research methodology of the food
waste reduction strategies and practices that are currently followed in the
food industry. Furthermore, the research methodology allowed us to develop and
recommend effective food waste reduction practices that would help to reduce
food insecurity. For the current research methodology following steps would be
taken (Kiger, 2020):
·
First of all, different secondary data sources have been
identified as there is a diverse range of sources which includes research articles
published on different research databases such as emerald, jstor, sciencedirect
and francis & taylor. Varied information has been provided from the
secondary data sources that relate to the practices and the strategy in the
food industry but detailed information would be obtained.
·
In the second step data has been collected systematically
from different databases using the keywords such as food waste, waste
reduction, food waste reduction strategies etc and compiled as different data
sources have been accessed earlier and the most relevant data have been chosen
for the research. The data which has been collected from different secondary
sources include both qualitative as well as quantitative data. Using the mix
method research choice both qualitative and quantitative data is analysed.
·
After the collection of the most relevant data thematic
analysis has been conducted in which common themes have been identified and
their pattern has been observed so that findings have been obtained from the
data. There would be a comprehensive exploration of the research topic using
thematic analysis as the data will be organized and coded as per the identified
theme (Braun, 2019).
·
In the next stage, the data will be interpreted to provide
valuable insight about the research topic as findings would be synthesized and
presented in the form of a report that addresses the research question
effectively.
During
the secondary research for the chosen research topic ethical consideration will
be taken into account. The data sources that will be utilized for the research
would be kept confidential and privacy would be maintained for the data that
would be obtained after permission. Guidelines and the principles provided for
research ethics have been observed in the current results.
1.6 Research Significance
The
current research topic is of great significance as it has a profound effect on
the sustainability of the environment and economy of the world. There is a
global need to reduce food waste that has an adverse impact on the lives of
humans as well as the planet. In the current research, the issue has been
recognized for the global food supply chain and its detrimental impact on life.
The research also highlights the need to implement effective strategies on an
urgent basis to reduce waste and save the world (Mardani, 2020). Addressing the
issue in the current research, the significant environmental problem such as
loss of biodiversity and greenhouse gas emissions resulting from climate change
would also be highlighted. The negative environmental impact that has been
associated with food waste has also been reviewed and the practices are also
evaluated to develop the most appropriate strategy with a focus on the
optimization by efficient resource utilization and mitigating the associated
environmental risks.
The
financial implication that has been raised by the food based in the supply
chain process has also been addressed through this research as it identifies
and promotes the practices that will reduce food waste and empower the
businesses to focus on economic efficiency. The business expenditure will be
reduced by effective and efficient practices that deal with the production
storage and disposal of food in the proper way leading toward increased
profitability and efficient resource utilization (Chauhan, 2021). Food insecurity at the global
level would also be alleviated and poverty would be reduced by following the
recommended practices in the current results. There will be an increase in
social equity as food would be delivered to needy people instead of going to
waste. Food accessibility would be enhanced by promoting practices aimed at
reducing wastage.
In
addition to the above-mentioned significance of the research, findings will
also be valuable for the business companies that are operating in the food industry
as well as the policymakers who are introducing highly optimized food practices
(Krishnan, 2021). Businesses can also utilize the
recommended practices to become more socially responsible and reduce food
waste.
1.7 Dissertation structure
In
the current research, there would be five different chapters in which a
thorough examination has been carried out for the food reduction practices by
integrating the existing supply chain strategy.
● The first chapter is about the
introduction in which the overview of the research topic has been provided in
the form of the background and significance. The chapter also enclosed the aim
of the research, its objective, and questions along with the outline for the
methodology that will be utilized for the research.
● A comprehensive review of the
literature has been provided in chapter two that relates to the food waste
reduction practice and its consequences on the environment, community as well
as the economy. In this chapter, the supply chain strategies that are already
existing would also be reviewed to identify the particular gap and provide a
theoretical framework for the research.
● In the third chapter, the
methodology of the research will be elaborated using the research design and
approach for the collection of data and the techniques that would be utilized
for their analysis. Furthermore, in this chapter, the ethical consideration for
the research will also be listed along with its justification for the choosing
methodology and how it would be helpful to achieve the research objective.
● The findings of the research have
been presented in Chapter 4 under the name of finding an analysis in which
thematic analysis would be carried out. Analysis along with the interpretation
has been provided in this chapter based on the research question using the
tables and visual representation of the collected data.
● Chapter 5 is about discussion of the
results of the research as well as also concluding of the major findings. The
practical implication would be provided in this chapter by comparison of the
examination literature and the research outcome would be reviewed. A summary of
the key finding has been provided under the conclusion where the limitation of
the research has also been highlighted along with the future studies.
Chapter 2: Literature review:
Food waste is a
major problem on a global scale with serious repercussions for the economy,
society, and environment. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates
that every year, about 1.3 billion tons, or one-third of all food produced for
human use is lost or wasted. This waste exerts a heavy load on the planet’s
resources and increases greenhouse gas emissions. It also represents a lost
opportunity to reduce hunger and malnutrition (Ali et al., 2019). Given these troubling figures, it is imperative to
assess and suggest practical methods for reducing food waste. A comprehensive
strategy that engages multiple stakeholders from production and processing
through distribution and consumption along the whole food supply chain is
needed to address food waste. Supply chain management tactics among these
parties are essential in reducing waste at every stage of the food supply chain
(Del Borghi, Moreschi,
& Gallo, 2020). Reduced food waste can be achieved through effective
supply chain management, which can also improve collaboration and assure
resource efficiency.
Two core
ideas—Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) and the Triple Bottom Line
(TBL) approach—form the theoretical underpinning for this literature
assessment. To achieve sustainable results, SSCM entails integrating
environmental, social, and economic factors into supply chain procedures.
Organizations can put plans in place that address reducing food waste while
taking the larger effects on society and the environment into account by
adopting SSCM principles (Hodgkins,
Rundle-Thiele, Knox, & Kim, 2019). By highlighting the necessity of measuring and
evaluating performance across three dimensions—people, planet, and profit—the
TBL method supports SSCM. This paradigm offers a thorough lens through which
initiatives for reducing food waste can be evaluated in terms of their social
responsibility, economic viability, and impact on the environment. This
literature review’s use of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach is also
crucial. LCA is a methodical strategy for evaluating the environmental effects
of goods or processes throughout the course of their full life cycles, from the
extraction of raw materials to the disposal of discarded products (Nadeau & Koebele,
2023). Researchers can quantitatively assess the possible advantages and
trade-offs associated with various solutions by conducting LCAs on approaches
for reducing food waste. This method offers a more sophisticated comprehension
of the environmental problem areas and areas where the food supply chain has
room to grow.
This literature
review’s main objective is to evaluate current supply chain approaches for food
waste reduction and provide applicable recommendations. Source reduction
strategies, demand management, consumer behavior, stock and distribution
efficiency, collaboration and partnerships, logistics optimization, and food
recovery are a few of the topics that will be explored in-depth. The review’s
objective is to explore these variables and provide light on the most effective
approaches and advised procedures for cutting waste along the entire food
supply chain (Papargyropoulou,
Lozano, Steinberger, Wright, & bin Ujang, 2014). Using case studies and actual data, this literature
analysis will also assess the effectiveness of current supply chain management
techniques. This study could be assessed to establish the advantages,
disadvantages, and results of several methods of minimizing food waste. The
review will also point out any difficulties or limitations observed while using
these strategies, as well as any areas that need more investigation and
creativity (Parfitt, Barthel,
& Macnaughton, 2010).
The goal of this
literature review is to give a thorough analysis of efficient approaches to
reduce food waste in light of existing supply chain procedures. To provide
pertinent insights into long-term strategies for reducing food waste and
achieving a more resource-efficient and resilient food system, the review aims
to incorporate theoretical frameworks, case studies, and empirical research.
2.1
Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM)
2.1.1 Definition and Principles of
SSCM
In order to
achieve outcomes that are sustainable, sustainable supply chain management
(SSCM) incorporates economic, social, and environmental factors into supply
chain activities. It acknowledges that supply chains encompass a network of
connected businesses, including suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and
retailers, and go beyond the purview of a single company (Roy, Schoenherr, &
Charan, 2018). With an emphasis on reducing detrimental effects on the environment,
society, and future generations, SSCM seeks to optimize these interconnected
systems.
Figure 1: Sustainable
supply chain management source: (Lazarova, Meglena &
Sapundzhi, Fatima, 2023).
Following
guidelines must account for achieving the sustainability which serves as the
foundation of SSCM.
a) Environmental protection: SSCM emphasizes the need of protecting and preserving
the environment. It encourages the use of clean technology throughout the
supply chain and promotes resource efficiency, waste reduction, pollution
prevention, and waste reduction (Svensson, 2007).
b) Social responsibility: SSCM understands the value of social justice and
well-being. Fair treatment of employees, adherence to labor laws, respect for
human rights, and involvement in local communities are all required (Xie & Breen, 2014).
c) Economic Viability: SSCM recognizes that sustainability has an economic
component. It aims to provide value while preserving long-term profitability
and competitiveness for all supply chain participants.
2.1.2 SSCM’s Contribution to Reducing
Food Waste
By fostering
cooperation, boosting efficiency, and eliminating waste at each stage of the
supply chain, SSCM plays a critical role in addressing the decrease of food
waste. Here are some significant ways that SSCM reduces food waste:
a) Supply Chain Visibility: SSCM places a strong emphasis on the value of supply
chain traceability. Organizations can spot inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and
wasteful regions by having a detailed awareness of the entire supply chain.
With better tracking and monitoring of food products, prompt interventions, and
waste reduction are made possible (Papargyropoulou et
al., 2014).
b) Supplier management: SSCM promotes collaboration with vendors who have an
interest in sustainability. Organizations can promote a more sustainable supply
chain by evaluating suppliers’ social and environmental performance (Nadeau & Koebele,
2023). As a result, there is less chance of food waste because the raw
materials are coming from trustworthy and ethical sources.
c) Process improvement: To reduce waste production, SSCM encourages process
improvement throughout the supply chain. It entails strengthening inventory
management procedures as well as optimizing production, packing, and shipping (Del Borghi et al.,
2020). Organizations can lessen the possibility of food waste across the
supply chain by optimizing these operations.
d) Collaboration and Partnerships: SSCM places a strong emphasis on partnerships amongst
supply chain participants. Organizations can exchange best practices,
resources, and information for decreasing food waste by cooperating. In order
to collaboratively solve the problems of food waste, collaboration can take the
shape of cooperative initiatives, information sharing, and coordinated
activities (Zailani, Jeyaraman,
Vengadasan, & Premkumar, 2012).
2.2
Important SSCM concepts and frameworks Relevant to Reducing Food Waste
Several important
SSCM principles and frameworks are pertinent to attempts to reduce food waste.
Figure 2: Strategy and
organizational culture
a) Closed-Loop Supply Chain: This idea emphasizes the recovery, recycling, and
reuse of goods and materials. When it comes to food waste, this idea entails
putting processes in place for food recovery, such as giving surplus food to
those in need or using food scraps for compost or animal feed. The architecture
of a closed-loop supply chain ensures that waste is minimized and resources are
used to their full potential.
b) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): LCA is a methodology used to evaluate how items or
processes affect the environment over the course of their entire life cycle.
LCA can be used to identify hotspots and possibilities for waste reduction in
the manufacturing, processing, distribution, consumption, and disposal stages
of food waste (Curran, 2013). By measuring the environmental trade-offs related to
various options for reducing food waste, LCA aids in decision-making (Heijungs, Huppes,
& Guinée, 2010).
c) Lean and Six Sigma: These process improvement approaches place a strong
emphasis on minimizing waste, minimizing variability, and raising productivity.
These approaches can be used to find and fix inefficiencies in the food supply
chain that result in food waste (Powell, Lundeby,
Chabada, & Dreyer, 2017). Organizations can increase process efficiency,
eliminate waste production, and limit defects by implementing lean and Six
Sigma techniques.
D) Circular Economy: This idea encourages moving away from a linear “take-make-dispose"
model and toward one that strives to preserve resources for as long as
feasible. Closing nutrient loops, lowering food waste creation, and increasing
food waste recycling or repurposing are all aspects of the circular economy
strategy in the context of food waste (Amani, Lindbom,
Sundström, & Östergren, 2015). Organizations may help reduce food waste and build a
more sustainable food system by embracing the ideas of the circular economy.
SSCM offers a
framework for incorporating sustainability factors into supply chain
activities, to sum up. SSCM places a strong emphasis on supply chain
visibility, supplier management, process improvement, and stakeholder
collaboration in the context of reducing food waste. Closed-loop supply chains,
life cycle assessments, lean and Six Sigma, and circular economies are examples
of key SSCM concepts and frameworks that provide useful tools and methods for
tackling the problems associated with food waste (Otles, Despoudi,
Bucatariu, & Kartal, 2015). Organizations can efficiently reduce food waste and
contribute to a more sustainable and effective food supply chain by
implementing SSCM principles and utilizing these frameworks.
2.3
TBL Concept:
A paradigm known
as the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) approach broadens the conventional emphasis on
financial success to include three interconnected dimensions: people, planet,
and profit. It pushes for organizations to monitor and manage their performance
across all three dimensions and acknowledges that their operations have an
impact on society, the environment, and the economy (Amani et al., 2015).
Figure 3: Tripple
bottom line theoretical concept source:
(Social Accountability International, 2023)
a) People:
The TBL's "people" component refers to how company operations affect
people and communities on a social level. Fair labor standards, employee
well-being, community involvement, and human rights are a few factors to take
into account (Curran, 2013).
b) Planet:
The planet component highlights how commercial operations affect the
environment. The management of resource use, reduction of pollution and waste
production, preservation of biodiversity, averting climate change, and
promotion of sustainable practices are all part of this process (Despoudi, Bucatariu,
Otles, & Kartal, 2021).
c) Profit: The
profitability of business operations is represented by the profit dimension. It
includes the capacity to add value for stakeholders as well as financial
performance, profitability, return on investment, and other factors (Kumar, Sharma, Raut,
Mangla, & Choubey, 2022).
The TBL strategy
encourages businesses to understand that achieving sustainable success involves
more than just financial advantages; it also involves having a beneficial
impact on society and the environment.
Figure 4: triple
bottom line constituents source:
(Avramenko, 2018)
2.3.1 Application of TBL in Relation
to Reducing Food Waste
The TBL strategy,
which takes into account the various sustainability aspects related to this
issue, is very pertinent to tackling the reduction of food waste. The TBL can
be used in the context of reducing food waste in the following ways:
a) People: The
TBL urges businesses to think about how food waste affects people individually
and collectively. It encourages programs that aim to lessen food insecurity,
increase access to nutrient-dense foods, and work with stakeholders to solve
issues related to food waste (Otles et al., 2015). For instance, businesses can work with local
governments, food banks, and community organizations to create initiatives that
give extra food to those in need.
b) Planet:
The TBL underlines the negative effects that food waste has on the environment
and calls on businesses to reduce waste production and advance resource
efficiency along the whole food supply chain. Using techniques like composting,
anaerobic digestion, and recycling can help prevent food waste from ending up
in landfills and cut greenhouse gas emissions (Singh &
Srivastava, 2022). Organizations can also implement packaging and
transportation practices that reduce the environmental effects of food waste.
c) Profit:
The TBL is aware that employing sustainable methods can have positive effects
on the economy. Organizations can improve operational effectiveness, optimize
inventory control, and lower waste disposal costs by decreasing food waste (Singh &
Srivastava, 2022). Adopting cutting-edge methods and tactics for
reducing food waste can also help brands stand out in the market, improve their
reputation, and open up new business prospects.
2.3.2 Advantages and Difficulties of
Using a TBL Approach:
The adoption of a
TBL approach in food waste reduction offers several benefits, but it also
presents challenges that organizations must overcome:
Benefits:
a) Enhanced Sustainability Performance: The TBL
approach allows organizations to holistically assess and manage their
sustainability performance. Organizations can achieve comprehensive and
balanced results by taking into account the social, environmental, and economic
components (Tanveer, Ishaq, &
Gough, 2021).
b) Competitive Advantage: Embracing the TBL approach
can differentiate organizations in the marketplace. Demonstrating commitment to
social and environmental responsibility can attract customers, investors, and
stakeholders who value sustainability (Kumar et al., 2022).
c) Risk Mitigation: Addressing food waste through a
TBL lens can help organizations manage risks associated with resource scarcity,
regulatory compliance, and reputational damage.
Challenges:
a) Measurement and reporting: It can be difficult to accurately measure and report
progress across the three dimensions of the TBL. To properly evaluate their
performance and convey their sustainability efforts, organizations require
accurate data and the right measurements (Kumar et al., 2022).
b) Trade-offs and Prioritization: To balance the TBL's various dimensions, trade-offs
may need to be made. Depending on their particular situation and the
expectations of their stakeholders, organizations may need to prioritize some
issues (Otles et al., 2015). Stakeholder involvement and deliberate
decision-making are required.
c) Alignment and Integration: Using a TBL method necessitates both alignment with
overarching strategic objectives and integration across corporate functions.
This can entail overcoming internal resistance, dismantling silos, and
promoting a sustainability culture across the entire organization (Singh &
Srivastava, 2022).
In conclusion, the
TBL strategy offers businesses a thorough framework for tackling food waste
reduction. Organizations can evaluate their social, environmental, and economic
implications associated to food waste by taking the people, planet, and profit
dimensions into consideration. Benefits of the TBL strategy include improved
sustainability performance, competitive advantage, and risk reduction (Despoudi et al., 2021). However, it also raises issues with integration,
trade-offs, and measurement and reporting. Despite these difficulties,
organizations that want to significantly reduce food waste while still having a
good social and environmental impact must adopt a TBL strategy.
2.4
Food waste reduction practices:
Practices for
reducing food waste include a variety of plans and programs designed to reduce
food waste along the entire food supply chain. Various stages, including
production, processing, distribution, retail, and consumer consumption are the
focus of these activities (Singh &
Srivastava, 2022). This section will examine important methods for
reducing food waste, their efficacy, and notable cases by drawing on the
material that has already been published.
Strategies for Source Reduction: Source reduction aims to stop food waste at the
source, typically during production and processing. This entails putting into
action procedures including streamlining the timing of agricultural planting
and harvesting, enhancing crop forecasting, and minimizing overproduction (Tanveer et al., 2021). The literature emphasizes the value of cooperation
among farmers, processors, and retailers to enable precise demand forecasts and
prompt inventory management, as well as the effectiveness of source reduction
measures in dramatically reducing food waste.
Consumer Behavior and Demand Management: Demand management solutions seek to change consumer
habits and lessen food waste at the consumer level. According to published
research, increasing consumer knowledge, teaching people how to handle and
store food properly, and encouraging mindful eating can all have a positive
influence on consumer behavior and help cut down on household food waste (Kumar et al., 2022). Initiatives that provide recipes for reusing
leftovers and waste-reduction advice, such as campaigns, apps, and websites,
have shown efficacy in promoting behavior change.
Optimization of Inventory and Distribution: Reducing food waste can be accomplished in a
substantial way by employing effective inventory management and distribution
techniques. In order to maximize inventory levels and lessen the possibility of
overstocking or understocking, literature emphasizes the necessity of real-time
data sharing, good communication, and coordination among supply chain
stakeholders (Singh &
Srivastava, 2022). Innovative technologies have been investigated as
techniques to boost inventory and distribution efficiency, including predictive
analytics, IoT-based monitoring systems, and RFID tags.
Collaboration and partnerships: Collaboration and partnerships are essential for the
effective reduction of food waste across supply chain participants. The
importance of creating networks and projects that promote collaboration,
information sharing, and resource pooling is emphasized in literature. Examples
include public-private partnerships centered on waste reduction and recycling,
cooperation between farmers and processors for product customization, and
partnerships between retailers and food banks for the redistribution of surplus
food.
Food Recovery and Reverse Logistics: Food recovery, repurposing, and redistribution are
all part of reverse logistics methods. The effectiveness of food recovery
initiatives, where food that would otherwise go to waste is redirected to
people in need, is highlighted in the literature. Partnerships with food banks,
philanthropic groups, and social entrepreneurs are a feature of these
activities (Amani et al., 2015). Additionally, the effective redistribution of
surplus food has been made possible by the use of technological platforms and
apps that link food providers with recipient groups.
Overall, research
on the subject shows that several supply chain strategies for reducing food
waste are effective. Reduced food waste has been achieved through the use of
source reduction techniques, demand management programs, inventory optimization,
collaboration and partnerships, reverse logistics, and food recovery programs (Otles et al., 2015). However, in order for these techniques to be widely
adopted, issues like lack of awareness, limited infrastructure, and regulatory
restrictions still remain and need to be addressed. To make a real difference
in decreasing food waste, more research is required to assess the scalability,
affordability, and long-term sustainability of these methods.
2.5
Limitations and Obstacles
Effective Food Waste Reduction Practices
Implementation Barriers:
a) Lack of
knowledge: Lack of knowledge and awareness among stakeholders is one of the
major obstacles to the implementation of methods to reduce food waste. Many
people and organizations might not fully comprehend the scope and effects of
food waste, which hinders their ability to take preventive action (Heijungs et al., 2010).
b) Fragmented Supply Chains: The food supply chain is frequently fragmented, with
many stakeholders and a variety of motivations, priorities, and goals for each
group. As collaboration and information exchange grow increasingly difficult as
a result of this fragmentation, it may be difficult to put into effect
coordinated methods for reducing food waste.
c) Infrastructure Restrictions: Appropriate infrastructure, such as facilities for
food recovery, composting, or anaerobic digestion, is frequently needed for
effective food waste reduction strategies. However, in some areas, a lack of
acceptable infrastructure or insufficient waste management systems can make it
difficult to put these strategies into effect (Kumar et al., 2022).
d) Regulatory Obstacles: The application of techniques for reducing food waste
may be hampered by current laws and regulations. Food recovery or
redistribution operations may be discouraged by regulations regarding food
safety, labeling, and responsibility due to worries about legal repercussions.
Existing supply chain strategies drawbacks:
a) Lack of Standardization: Measuring, reporting, and metrics for food waste are
not standardized. It is difficult to compare and measure performance across
various supply chains or businesses as a result, which hinders the creation of
standardized and efficient food waste reduction initiatives (Otles et al., 2015).
b) Limited Data Availability: Particularly at particular levels of the supply
chain, accurate and thorough data on food waste generation, disposal, and
reasons may not be readily available. The capacity to pinpoint the underlying
causes of food waste and create focused treatments is hampered by a lack of
data.
b) Cost and Economic Considerations: Adopting strategies to reduce food waste may call for
up-front investments, adjustments to existing procedures, or the use of novel
technologies. Particularly for small and medium-sized firms (SMEs) with limited
resources, the related expenses and potential economic ramifications can be a
hurdle (Heijungs et al., 2010).
d) Challenges with Behavior Change: It can be difficult to influence the behavior of
customers, producers, merchants, and other supply chain participants. Food
waste habits and attitudes must be changed over time through sustained
involvement, education, and awareness programs.
It takes
coordinated efforts from numerous stakeholders, including governments,
businesses, consumers, and civil society organizations, to address these
difficulties and restrictions. Collaboration, innovation, and the creation of
helpful laws and infrastructure are all necessary for removing obstacles and
enhancing the efficacy of supply chain tactics.
2.6 Identified gap in literature:
The preceding literature
analysis gives useful insights into supply chain measures for decreasing food
waste, emphasising the significance of Sustainable Supply Chain Management
(SSCM) and the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) approach. It also highlights the
importance of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in assessing environmental impacts.
Nonetheless, despite its thorough study, there are some holes that must be
filled.
To begin, while the
literature review examines numerous supply chain techniques for decreasing food
waste, it does not provide a deep examination of the obstacles and barriers
that organisations experience when adopting these strategies. Understanding the
roadblocks encountered while implementing waste reduction practises is critical
for developing successful solutions. For example, the evaluation acknowledges
regulatory challenges briefly but does not dive into specific legislation or
their impact on food waste reduction measures (Bosona and Gebresenbet, 2018). It is critical to investigate the
legal and policy frameworks that impede or support waste reduction activities
in order to provide targeted interventions and policy recommendations. Second,
the literature review focuses exclusively on the supply side of the food chain,
such as production, processing, and distribution, without adequately
investigating the consumer side. Consumer attitudes and behaviour have a
substantial impact on food waste generation, and understanding these aspects is
critical for developing successful demand-side control methods. More study
should be conducted to investigate consumer perspectives, habits, and
understanding about food waste, as well as how interventions can encourage more
sustainable consumption patterns (Annosi, et al., 2021).
Another gap in the
research is the lack of a thorough examination of the social and economic
consequences of food waste reduction techniques. While the Triple Bottom Line
(TBL) concept is acknowledged, there is little discussion of how organisations
might balance social, environmental, and economic components in their waste
reduction activities. Examining case studies or real-world examples of
businesses that have effectively incorporated TBL concepts into their waste
reduction initiatives would provide significant insights for other
organisations.
Furthermore, a more
in-depth examination of the role of technology and innovation in food waste
reduction could enrich the literature review. The assessment mentions IoT-based
monitoring systems and RFID tags for inventory optimisation, but there is room
for more research into how emerging technologies such as artificial
intelligence, blockchain, and data analytics might improve supply chain
efficiency and waste reduction (Bosona
and Gebresenbet, 2018).
Finally, while the literature review emphasises the importance of collaboration
and partnerships across supply chain stakeholders, it does not go into detail
about the obstacles and potential of cross-sectoral collaboration (Annosi, et al., 2021).
Understanding the dynamics of relationships between public, private, and civil
society actors can lead to more successful waste reduction measures and
stimulate food supply chain innovation.
Finally, the study of the
literature provides a solid framework for understanding supply chain approaches
to decreasing food waste. Addressing the identified gaps, on the other hand,
would result in a more thorough and nuanced understanding of the waste
reduction issues and opportunities, opening the way for more effective and
sustainable solutions in the future.
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
Saunder research
onion is considered as the standard for the research methodology, as saunder
research onion model gives detailed explanation of each step (Sahay, 2016). Onion model consists of different layers and these
research layers are explained below in detail:
Figure 5: Saunder research onion model source: (15 writers,
2023)
3.1
Research philosophy:
By using
quantitative techniques to measure and evaluate data on food waste across the
supply chain, positivism, with its emphasis on objectivity, quantification, and
generalizability, could be applied in this study. This would entail gathering
extensive data on the amount of food wasted, performing statistical analysis to
spot trends, and drawing generalizations about practical tactics (Saunders, Lewis,
Thornhill, & Bristow, 2015). Positivism may offer insightful information about
the scope and incidence of food waste in the sector, assisting in the
identification of crucial areas for change.
Conversely,
interpretivism provides a distinct viewpoint by highlighting the individualized
and situational aspect of human experiences. Interpretivism would entail
comprehending the underlying assumptions, motives, and social dynamics that
affect the acceptance and efficiency of various techniques in the context of
activities to reduce food waste (Melnikovas, 2018). To record stakeholders' opinions, experiences, and
issues linked to reducing food waste, qualitative approaches, such as
observations or interviews, could be used. Through this method, stakeholders in
the food business could gain a deeper grasp of the challenges they confront and
potential new solutions.
Interpretivism is
in line with the research topic's emphasis on comprehending and providing
practical methods for reducing food waste. The adoption and success of these
practices are influenced by a variety of social, cultural, and environmental
factors (Sahay, 2016). By examining these influences, interpretivism can
produce insightful findings that go beyond simple statistical associations. The
collaborative procedures, stakeholder motives, and systemic difficulties that
affect the application of food waste reduction initiatives can be clarified.
This knowledge can help to improve efforts to reduce food waste by directing
the creation of focused and context-specific recommendations.
In conclusion,
interpretivism is more appropriate for the research issue even though
positivism might provide useful quantitative statistics and generalizable
insights on the incidence of food waste. It enables a thorough investigation of
the societal, cultural, and environmental aspects that affect how the food
sector reduces food waste. Interpretivism can offer valuable insights and
suggestions for solutions to reduce food waste by comprehending the
perspectives, goals, and difficulties of stakeholders.
3.2
Research approach:
Both inductive and
deductive approaches have advantages and disadvantages when analyzing and
recommending efficient methods for reducing food waste with the use of current
supply chain tactics.
Deductive approach: The formation of a hypothesis or a group of predetermined ideas is the
first step in the deductive approach. Researchers start with hypotheses or
frameworks that already exist and then put them to the test with actual data.
With this strategy, researchers use current knowledge to direct the collecting
and analysis of data in a top-down manner (Mayer, 2015). In order to arrive at specific conclusions,
deductive reasoning relies on logical inferences based on broad principles or
theories.
A deductive
approach in the context of supply chain strategies and their effect on food
waste reduction would require recognizing existing ideas or frameworks. To
evaluate the accuracy or application of these pre-existing theories in the food
sector, researchers would gather pertinent data that fits with them (Melnikovas, 2018). When there is an established body of knowledge and
researchers wish to test particular theories or hypotheses, they should use this
strategy.
Inductive approach: Deductive thinking moves in one direction, whilst the inductive method
goes in the other. In order to develop new theories, concepts, or frameworks
based on noticed patterns or themes, it entails the collecting and analysis of
data (Saunders et al., 2015). The inductive method enables researchers to spot new
patterns or insights in the data and create theories that are supported by
empirical facts.
An inductive
approach would entail gathering primary or secondary data on current supply
chain methods and analyzing it to find recurrent themes, patterns, or best
practices associated with food waste reduction. On the basis of these empirical
results, researchers would then develop theories or frameworks. When there is
little prior knowledge or when researchers want to investigate fresh angles and
create recommendations that are relevant to a given environment, the inductive
technique is advantageous.
Suitability for the Research:
The inductive methodology seems to be more
appropriate for the research analyzing and recommending efficient methods for
reducing food waste using current supply chain tactics. This is so that the
research's goal, which is to study and glean insights into the practices,
problems, and possibilities within the food business, can be accomplished. Researchers
can study current data in a methodical way, spot emerging themes, and develop
theories or frameworks tailored to methods for reducing food waste by using an
inductive approach (Saunders et al., 2015).
The inductive
technique enables researchers to capture the many and context-specific
components of food waste reduction initiatives throughout the supply chain and
allows for a bottom-up study of the data. It gives the adaptability to deal
with particular difficulties and chances that may come up during the study
process (Mayer, 2015). The inductive approach emphasizes the significance
of understanding the social and cultural factors that determine food waste
reduction practices, which is in line with the interpretative research
philosophy mentioned previously.
In conclusion,
while both the deductive and inductive approaches have benefits, the inductive
approach is more suited for the research on evaluating and recommending
efficient methods for reducing food waste using already-in-use supply chain
tactics (Mayer, 2015). The inductive method enables the investigation of
new themes and the creation of frameworks or theories that are context-specific
and supported by empirical data. It fits in nicely with the objective of
developing fresh perspectives and suggestions that deal with the difficulties
of reducing food waste in the food business.
3.3
Research strategy:
A mix method research
plan fits with the stated approach when taking into account the research
methodology mentioned in the 1st chapter, which concentrates on the
examination of secondary data using a qualitative and quantitative theme
approach. In order to discover themes and patterns relating to food waste
reduction techniques in the food sector, this qualitative research strategy
involves the systematic examination and interpretation of secondary data that
has been gathered (Sahay, 2016).
Content analysis is a research approach that entails
doing a systematic and objective assessment of existing texts, documents, or
other forms of communication in order to discover patterns, themes, and
insights relating to a given research question or topic. Content analysis in
the context of food waste reduction practices in the food business would entail
obtaining relevant publications, research papers, industry statistics, and
other secondary sources. The content would then be thoroughly analyzed and
interpreted by researchers in order to uncover major themes, practices,
challenges, and possibilities in the field of food waste reduction. Content
analysis is an organized and rigorous technique to assessing the present state
of food waste reduction efforts, providing for comprehensive data-driven
insights while avoiding the necessity for primary data collection. Other
research strategies are linked with primary data collection such as interviews,
surveys and case studies etc. this research study chooses the content analysis
as the research strategy because only secondary data has been used for this
research.
3.4
Research Choice:
The employment of
a hybrid methodological technique in a study is referred to as a mix-method
research strategy (Saunders et al., 2015). The methodology used in this instance is qualitative
and quantitative especially makes use of thematic analysis of secondary
material. To find common themes and patterns relating to food waste reduction
practices in the food business, the researcher has methodically examined and
interpret the secondary data that has been gathered.
The research
design provided is compatible with a mix-method approach focusing primarily on
qualitative secondary data analysis because the research methodology and
somehow specifically specify the integration of quantitative data or the use of
various data gathering methods. Therefore, a mix-method approach using
qualitative and quantitative thematic analysis of secondary data would be the
best option for this study's research design.
3.5
Time Horizon:
This study's time
horizon is on acquiring and examining secondary data that depicts the level of
food waste reduction practices within the food sector at a certain point in
time. The study was carried out by gathering information from reports and
sources that were already in existence and accessible at the time of the
investigation. By analyzing linkages, patterns, and characteristics of food
waste reduction practices at a specific point in time, the cross-sectional
design offers a picture of the current state of affairs (Saunders et al., 2015). The length of time that secondary data was gathered
and the temporal range of the reports and sources that are readily available
decide the precise chronological horizon of the investigation. It is
significant to highlight that the research does not entail gathering or
analyzing data over a prolonged period of time in order to monitor changes or
trends over time (Melnikovas, 2018). Instead, it focuses on evaluating the information
gathered to learn more about how the food business has reduced food waste over
the course of the designated time period.
3.6
Data Collection:
For this study,
secondary data were gathered and analyzed from a variety of databases such as
emerald, jstor, sciencedirect and research papers and articles has been used
for the content analysis. The researcher methodically locates and obtains
pertinent secondary data sources that offer details on tactics and methods used
in the food business to reduce food waste (Melnikovas, 2018). These sources are currently being read through and
examined in order to glean insightful conclusions and suggestions.
The researcher
starts by identifying several sources that are likely to include details on strategies
for reducing food waste before beginning to gather secondary data from them. To
obtain a variety of data relevant to the research objectives, the researcher
conducts a thorough search (Terry, Hayfield,
Clarke, & Braun, 2017). The researcher then carefully reviews and analyzes
the data after obtaining the necessary secondary data sources. This entails
reviewing the chosen research papers, and publications and highlighting the
important data. Based on themes and subjects pertinent to strategies and
methods for reducing food waste, the data has been grouped and classified.
The researcher
finds common patterns, recurrent themes, and new insights in the gathered data
by employing a thematic method. In order to do this, the data must be coded and
categorized according to the recognized themes. The researcher acquires a
thorough understanding of the present methods and techniques used in the food
sector for reducing food waste by methodically evaluating the data. By
analyzing the secondary data, the researcher is able to make insightful
conclusions and suggestions on the best ways to reduce food waste in the food
business (Terry et al., 2017). It makes it possible to pinpoint effective projects,
stakeholder difficulties, and areas for development. The researcher compiles
the results of the data analysis into a thorough report that answers the study
question and makes insightful suggestions for advancing the fight against food
waste. It is crucial to keep in mind that the data gathering procedure only
concentrates on using already-existing data sources rather than undertaking
primary data collecting through surveys, interviews, or direct observations.
The research advances knowledge of the state of food waste reduction methods by
utilizing secondary data and offers evidence-based recommendations for
enhancing sustainability in the food business.
3.7
Data analysis:
In this study, a mixed-method approach is used to
analyze data gathered from multiple databases such as Emerald, JSTOR,
ScienceDirect, and others. Content analysis, a qualitative research method
focusing on methodically studying and interpreting the content of documents,
papers, and articles related to food waste reduction practices in the food
business, is utilized in the data analysis. Useful research papers, reports,
and articles collected from databases are carefully examined and coded for the
content analysis in order to uncover major themes and trends related to food
waste reduction (Melnikovas, 2018). Codes are provided to specific information and
conclusions in the papers to help with data organization and synthesis. To
provide a thorough picture of the research issue, the qualitative insights
produced through content analysis are supplemented by quantitative data
gathered through surveys or other ways. The mixed-method approach enables
triangulation of findings, which improves the validity and reliability of study
findings. The qualitative data from content analysis is utilized to gain
in-depth insights into the food industry's food waste reduction practices,
issues, and opportunities (Melnikovas, 2018). This mixed-method approach ensures a comprehensive
and well-rounded examination of food waste reduction practices in the food
industry by integrating both qualitative and quantitative data analysis
methods, ultimately providing valuable recommendations and insights to improve
sustainability and efficiency in the global food supply chain.
3.8
Ethical consideration:
In order to
maintain the integrity and secrecy of the research, ethical issues have given a
high priority. The preservation of participant anonymity and privacy has been
given top priority. There are no actual human participants in this study
because it makes use of secondary data analysis and acquisition. To protect
confidentiality, however, steps have been made to de-identify and anonymize any
private or delicate information present in the gathered data.
Another important
ethical factor has been to use the chosen secondary data sources only after
getting the required authorizations and following copyright laws. Maintaining
academic integrity and preventing plagiarism depend on acknowledging
information sources correctly and respecting intellectual property rights (Sahay, 2016). The ethical standards and principles established by
the appropriate professional groups and institutions have been observed
throughout the study procedure. This entails assuring the veracity and accuracy
of the data supplied, preventing conflicts of interest, and upholding
objectivity in the analysis and interpretation of the data.
Chapter 4: findings
The
research topic, "Evaluating and Recommending Effective Food Waste
Reduction Practises with the Help of Existing Supply Chain Strategies," is
thoroughly examined in the results and findings presented in this section. The
purpose of this research is to shed light on the existing strategies used by
the modern, global food business to minimise food waste and promote
sustainability across the supply chain. Using a qualitative research technique
and thematic analysis of carefully selected secondary data sources, this study
investigates the intricacies of food waste reduction measures, the problems in
executing them, and the potential application of new technology.
The
data was then subjected to thematic analysis to uncover recurring themes and
patterns, allowing for the extraction of significant insights and key
discoveries. Through this analytical procedure, the research evaluates the
existing, effective methods for reducing food waste, the factors necessitating
their efficient use, and the possible contribution of technology and innovation
to these initiatives. The
compiled findings that are presented in this section have the potential to
considerably advance our understanding of sustainable practices in the food
sector. This research gives helpful advice for industry stakeholders and
policymakers to solve the problems and move toward a more effective and
sustainable future by examining the effectiveness of current supply chain
tactics and practices for reducing food waste.
Additionally,
ethical concerns have been of the utmost importance throughout this work,
guaranteeing the privacy and confidentiality of the data sources used as well
as adhering to the tenets and standards of research ethics. With this in mind,
let's dive into the findings and outcomes that will illuminate the way to a
more sustainable food sector and an effective reduction in food waste.
Research
question 1:
There are two
themes have been developed using the secondary resources and these themes are
developed by the thematic analysis. Total 14 codes were identified in the
literature which helped to develop the following themes for this research
question. Codes are given in appendix A.
Theme 1: "Adoption and Implementation of Food
Waste Reduction Initiatives in the Food Industry"
The first subject that came out of the thematic
analysis is related to the wide range of food waste reduction measures that the
food sector has adopted and put into practice. The efforts being taken to
address the growing problem of food waste along the supply chain by many
stakeholders, such as food growers, manufacturers, retailers, and policymakers,
are highlighted by this theme (Ali, et al. 2022).
The creation of programmes for distributing food
surpluses is one notable move seen in the food sector. Through these
initiatives, extra food that would otherwise go to waste is donated to food
banks, shelters, and other charity organizations, assisting in the reduction of
waste and the alleviation of food insecurity. In addition, some businesses have
adopted "ugly produce" promotions, which encourage consumers to eat
imperfect or unattractive fruits and vegetables, reducing waste at the
production level.
To reduce food deterioration and expiration, a lot of
attention has also been paid to supply chain logistics and inventory management
system improvements. To keep products fresh, optimize shipping routes, and
speed up distribution procedures, supply chains are using cutting-edge
technologies like IoT (Internet of Things) sensors and data analytics (Ali, et al. 2022). These developments not only lessen food waste but also improve the
effectiveness of the entire supply chain, resulting in cost savings and
increased sustainability. Additionally, collaborations between corporations and
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have been crucial in advancing
initiatives to reduce food waste. The adoption of sustainable practices in the
food sector has increased as a result of collaborative projects that entail
sharing best practices, information, and resources. Additionally, industry-wide
commitments to decreasing food waste, such as the adoption of Sustainable
Development Goal 12.3 by the UN, have propelled companies to establish precise
waste reduction goals and implement practical strategies to meet them (Martin-Rios, Demen-Meier, Gössling, &
Cornuz, 2018).
Nevertheless, despite these encouraging developments,
obstacles still stand in the way of widespread acceptance of measures to reduce
food waste. The assumption that adopting sustainable practices will cost more
is a significant barrier. Some companies could be reluctant to invest in novel
techniques or methods because they believe that doing so might jeopardize their
capacity to make a profit. Therefore, demonstrating the long-term economic
benefits of decreased food waste, such as cost savings, greater resource
utilization, and improved brand perception, is an important area of focus going
forward.
Theme 2: "Consumer Behavior and Awareness in Food
Waste Reduction"
The investigation also revealed that consumer behavior
and awareness of the need to reduce food waste are important themes.
Understanding consumer attitudes and behaviors regarding food waste is critical
because they have a significant impact on the dynamics of supply and demand in
the food business.
The increased consumer awareness of food waste and its
effects on the environment is one noteworthy discovery. Demand for food
products that are produced sustainably and ethically is rising as people become
more conscious of the effects of wasteful habits (Martin-Rios, Demen-Meier, Gössling, &
Cornuz, 2018). As a result of the shift in
consumer tastes, food firms are now producing items with less packaging,
clearly labelling expiration dates, and providing choices for portion
management. Online platforms and social media have also become powerful
instruments for raising awareness of the need to reduce food waste. Consumers
are actively exchanging knowledge and advice on how to reduce food waste since
they are becoming more interested in environmental issues. These initiatives
have been boosted by influencers and celebrities who are fighting for the
reduction of food waste and inspiring their followers to change their
consumption patterns (Morone, Koutinas, Gathergood, Arshadi, & Matharu, 2019).
Nevertheless, despite the rising awareness, it is
still difficult to transform consumer information into meaningful behavior
change. Food waste frequently stems from issues including excessive shopping,
poor storage, and inadequate meal planning. This gap between awareness and
action can be closed by encouraging customers to develop conscious purchasing
practices, find inventive uses for leftovers, and take part in
neighborhood-based activities (Morone, Koutinas, Gathergood, Arshadi, & Matharu, 2019). The varied range of food waste reduction strategies
adopted by the food sector and the impact of consumer behavior and awareness on
the push for sustainability are the two key themes that emerged from the
thematic analysis of the data surrounding research question 1. The results
highlight the value of ongoing stakeholder engagement, technological
development, and focused consumer education to promote efficient food waste
reduction practices throughout the food supply chain. The food sector can
significantly advance towards a more sustainable and responsible future by
resolving the issues mentioned and building on the good developments.
Table 1:
frequency table for themes of RQ 1
|
Themes |
Frequency |
|
Theme 1 |
07 |
|
Theme 2 |
03 |
|
Results |
10 |
Figure 6:
Graph for table 1
Research
question 2:
The below given two themes have been developed which
were generated using the 20 codes given in the appendix B. these codes were
filtered and analyzed to achieve the objective of the research. Following are
the themes
Theme 1: Environmental Sustainability and Resource
Conservation
Due to its major impact on resource conservation and
environmental sustainability, the food industry must effectively execute food
waste reduction practices. Food waste contributes significantly to climate
change and environmental degradation by producing large amounts of greenhouse
gas emissions. Food that ends up in landfills decomposes and releases methane,
a strong greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere about 25 times more
efficiently than carbon dioxide. The food business can significantly contribute
to minimizing climate change and its harmful impacts on the globe by reducing
food waste (Morone,
Koutinas, Gathergood, Arshadi, & Matharu, 2019).
Aside from that, food production and distribution
demand a lot of resources, such as land, water, and energy. Food waste
increases the industry's environmental impact because it not only wastes these
resources but also necessitates more resources for disposal. The food business
may optimize resource use and reduce its ecological impact by putting effective
food waste reduction practices into place, which will help to preserve natural
resources and the overall health of ecosystems.
Theme 2: Economic Viability and Competitiveness
Effectively implementing food waste reduction
strategies is essential for food enterprises' competitiveness and economic
viability in addition to being an issue of environmental responsibility. For
both producers and manufacturers as well as merchants and customers, food waste
results in a considerable financial loss. Companies may lower expenses,
increase operational effectiveness, and boost their bottom line by minimizing
food waste (Martin-Rios,
Hofmann, & Mackenzie, 2020). The
importance of sustainability and ethical business practices is also rising
among investors and consumers. Businesses that show a dedication to reducing
food waste are likely to draw more environmentally concerned customers,
increasing brand loyalty and market share. Additionally, when making investment
decisions, investors are increasingly taking environmental, social, and
governance (ESG) considerations into account. Businesses that have effective
measures in place to reduce food waste are more likely to be viewed as ethical
and sustainable investments, giving them an edge over rivals. Implementing
strategies for reducing food waste might also encourage innovation in the food
sector (Martin-Rios,
Hofmann, & Mackenzie, 2020). To combat
food waste, businesses may investigate innovative technologies, procedures, and
business models, which could result in increased productivity and inventive
products. Adopting sustainable practices and catering to consumer demand for
eco-friendly items can expand a company's market reach and improve its standing
in a dynamically changing competitive environment.
Table 2:
frequency table for themes of RQ 2
|
Themes |
Frequency |
|
Theme 1 |
05 |
|
Theme 2 |
05 |
|
Results |
10 |
Figure 7:
Graph for table 2
In conclusion, due to the considerable consequences
for environmental sustainability, resource conservation, economic viability,
and competitiveness, effective implementation of food waste reduction practices
is crucial for the food sector. The sector may benefit economically and improve
its reputation in the market by minimizing food waste while also helping to
create a more sustainable future.
Research
question 3:
After analyzing the collected secondary data, it was
thoroughly examined and different codes were assigned to the important
information, those codes were then used to develop the following themes for
this research question. Total 24 codes were used to generate these themes given
in the appendix C.
Theme 1: Advanced Monitoring and Data Analytics for
Waste Reduction
By offering real-time monitoring and data processing
throughout the whole supply chain, the use of innovation and technology can
dramatically improve practices for reducing food waste. Various stages of the
food supply chain, such as production, shipping, warehousing, and retail, can
be combined with IoT (Internet of Things) sensors, RFID (Radio-Frequency
Identification) tags, and smart devices (Annosi, et al., 2021).
These innovations make it possible to track food
products accurately and continuously, maintaining ideal storage conditions. To
stop spoilage and increase the shelf life of perishable goods, for example,
temperature and humidity sensors can be installed in storage facilities. These
patterns of waste occurrence can then be identified through data analytics,
allowing businesses to make data-driven decisions for waste avoidance and
reduction. In a supply chain for perishable foods, a study by Bosona and Gebresenbet
(2018) shows how real-time monitoring and data analytics can cut down on food
waste. In a case study of the supply chain for fresh fruit, they discovered
that combining IoT sensors and data analytics might cut food wastage by up to
45%. Businesses can put focused measures in place to improve inventory
management and reduce losses by identifying areas of waste and inefficiency.
It is possible to predict demand trends, optimize
production schedules, and boost forecasting accuracy by using artificial intelligence
(AI) and machine learning algorithms. AI-powered solutions can assist food
producers and merchants better match their production and inventory levels with
real demand, avoiding overproduction and associated waste, by analyzing past
sales data, consumer preferences, and external factors like weather patterns.
Theme 2: Traceability and Transparency for Improved
Food Waste Management
Through better traceability and transparency in the
food supply chain, technology and innovation can also improve methods for
reducing food waste. Particularly with regard to achieving these objectives,
blockchain technology has emerged as a promising tool. Blockchain enables the
seamless tracking of food items from farm to fork by building an immutable and
transparent record of information about food products. A study by Yang et al.
(2021) demonstrates how blockchain-based traceability systems might support
initiatives to reduce food waste. The authors show how blockchain can give
customers real-time details regarding the production, handling, and delivery of
food products (Annosi,
et al., 2021). The likelihood of food waste
at the consumer level is decreased as a result of the enhanced transparency
that encourages consumer trust and enables people to make more educated shopping
decisions.
Additionally, blockchain technology can speed up
recalls in the event of food safety problems, saving food that would otherwise
go to waste due to a lack of specific information on the afflicted products.
Instead of recalling entire batches, businesses can reduce the amount of food
lost by rapidly identifying and removing only the impacted items. Additionally,
blockchain's capacity to build a secure, decentralized platform for information
exchange promotes cooperation and data sharing among supply chain participants.
The capacity to share data across stakeholders can improve coordination,
allowing them to work together to address problems with reducing food waste.
In addition to blockchain, cutting-edge technologies
like mobile applications can enable customers to make environmentally friendly
decisions. Apps can offer customized meal planning, recipe ideas for using
leftovers, and alerts for approaching food expirations, for instance. By
encouraging more effective meal planning and grocery shopping, research by Annosi, et al. (2021) emphasizes the potential of such apps to reduce
household food waste.
Table 3:
frequency table for themes of RQ 3
|
Themes |
Frequency |
|
Theme 1 |
06 |
|
Theme 2 |
04 |
|
Results |
10 |
Figure 8:
Graph for table 3
In summary, utilizing technology and innovation offers
enormous opportunity to improve methods of reducing food waste. Better
decision-making throughout the supply chain is made possible by advanced
monitoring and data analytics, which reduces waste and increases efficiency.
Additionally, customers are given the capacity to make sustainable decisions
and supply chain partners are encouraged to collaborate thanks to traceability
and transparency provided by blockchain and mobile applications. In order to
achieve significant and long-lasting reductions in food waste, the literature
now in circulation supports the effectiveness of these technologies in reducing
food waste and emphasizes the significance of their incorporation into
practices used in the food business.
Research question 4:
After examining the secondary data that had been
gathered, a thorough analysis was carried out, and 22 different codes were
given to the crucial details. The following coherent themes for answering the
study question were developed in large part because to these codes. Appendix D
contains the specifics of these codes and themes.
Theme 1: Supply Chain Complexity and Coordination
The inherent complexity and coordination necessary
within the supply chain is one of the main obstacles the food sector faces in
efficiently implementing food waste reduction practices. Numerous parties,
including farmers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and consumers, are
involved in the complex food supply chain. Food waste is a result of the
particular difficulties that arise at each stage of the supply chain. In order
to reduce food waste, a study by Anders, et al. (2021) emphasizes
the significance of supply chain collaboration and coordination. The
researchers discovered that inefficient supply chain partners can result in
overproduction, inaccurate demand forecasts, and delays in product
distribution. These inefficiencies can be caused by poor communication and a
lack of information sharing. Increased food waste and excess inventories are
the results of these inefficiencies.
Additionally, before reaching the final consumer, food
products frequently go through a number of intermediaries and go through
different handling procedures. There is a chance of quality deterioration or
spoilage at every stage. For instance, food products may be exposed to unfavorable
circumstances during shipping and storage, resulting in degradation and waste.
To successfully address these issues and put effective practices for reducing
food waste into practice, supply chain management is crucial. Adopting
collaborative and data-driven initiatives can improve stakeholder coordination
and communication. Using IoT sensors, real-time tracking, and predictive
analytics, businesses can optimize their supply chains and reduce food waste by
gaining important information into inventory levels, demand trends, and product
freshness.
Theme 2: Consumer Behavior and Perceptions
Influencing customer behavior and views around food
waste is a big obstacle the food business must overcome in order to reduce food
waste. The amount of food waste produced at the household level is
substantially influenced by consumer attitudes, purchase behaviors, and storage
practices. Food waste is caused by a number of consumer-related issues,
including misunderstandings about expiration dates, buying in bulk, and
aversions to "imperfect" produce, according to a study by Schanes, et al. (2018) Because of expiration dates, which may not correctly
reflect the product's true freshness or safety, consumers frequently throw food
away too soon. Bulk purchases may also result in more food spoiling if it is
not used right away.
Additionally, consumers' preferences for aesthetically
pleasing food and aesthetic standards set by retailers may cause them to reject
perfectly edible but aesthetically "imperfect" fruits and vegetables.
As a result, growers may toss out or leave unharvested crops that don't match
aesthetic criteria, which contributes to food waste at the production level.
Changing consumer views and behavior necessitates a
diverse strategy. Education programmes can be quite effective at spreading
knowledge about food waste and giving customers useful advice for cutting
waste. According to a study by Reynolds, et al. (2019), focused
education and awareness programmes could decrease household food waste by
promoting improved meal preparation, storage techniques, and leftover utilization.
Collaboration is also essential between customers, producers, and merchants.
Retailers can market "imperfect" produce and inform customers about
the value of making quality-based purchases as opposed to those based solely on
looks. Consumers may make smarter judgements and cut down on unnecessary food
waste by promoting a greater understanding of food safety and expiration dates
(Painter, Thondhlana,
& Kua, 2016).
Table 4:
frequency table for themes of RQ 4
|
Themes |
Frequency |
|
Theme 1 |
08 |
|
Theme 2 |
02 |
|
Results |
10 |
Figure 9:
Graph for table 4
In conclusion, the food business will have a difficult
time successfully applying practices to reduce food waste. Consumer behavior
and perceptions, coupled with supply chain complexity and coordination
challenges, are two important areas that require attention. The food sector may
overcome these obstacles and move towards a more sustainable and responsible
approach to food waste reduction by implementing collaborative and data-driven
supply chain management methods and tackling consumer-related variables through
education and awareness initiatives.
Research
question 5:
A detailed study was performed after evaluating the
secondary data that had been acquired, and 28 separate codes were assigned to
the critical facts. Because of these codes, the following cohesive themes for
answering the study question emerged. The specifics of these codes and motifs
can be found in Appendix E.
Theme 1: Inventory Management and Demand Forecasting
By enhancing inventory control and demand forecasting,
effective supply chain methods are crucial in decreasing food waste. Supply
chain managers can avoid overstocking, which frequently results in perishable
commodities reaching their expiration dates before being sold or used, by
regularly monitoring inventory levels. Understocking, on the other hand, might
lead to lost sales opportunities and disgruntled customers. To reduce waste, it
is essential to achieve the proper balance in inventory levels. According to a
study by Cai and Yang (2018), precise demand forecasting is crucial for waste
reduction. Businesses may more accurately estimate demand patterns using
previous sales data, industry trends, and consumer preferences, allowing them
to produce and stock the proper amount of goods. The accuracy of demand projections
can be improved by advanced data analytics and machine learning algorithms,
which will reduce surplus and improve inventory turnover.
Furthermore, accurate demand forecasting can help
suppliers and manufacturers work together more effectively. The availability of
raw materials is guaranteed by suppliers' ability to modify production
schedules in response to timely and accurate demand information. This
preventive approach lessens the possibility of supply chain disruptions and
avoids the buildup of surplus inventory (Painter, Thondhlana, & Kua, 2016).
For these supply chain strategies to be successfully implemented, integration
with business operations is essential. To share information and synchronize
strategies, supply chain managers must work closely with manufacturing teams,
sales teams, and other pertinent stakeholders. Real-time data can be used by
cross-functional teams to make wise choices about production volumes,
distribution paths, and inventory replenishment.
Additionally, the use of cloud-based platforms and
intelligent inventory management systems can simplify departmental
communication and information exchange. These digital solutions give
organizations the ability to see inventory levels, sales information, and
demand forecasts in real-time, allowing them to react quickly to market changes
and enhance supply chain operations.
Theme 2: Cold Chain Management and Quality Control
Especially in the case of perishable items, cold chain
management and quality control are crucial supply chain tactics for lowering
food waste. It is crucial to maintain ideal temperatures and conditions along
the whole supply chain to maintain the quality and freshness of food products
while reducing the chance of spoiling and waste (Shashi, et al. 2018). From the point of production to the point of
consumption, a constant, temperature-controlled environment must be maintained.
This approach is especially pertinent for perishable goods like fresh produce,
dairy products, and meat because they are very likely to degrade if improperly
transported and stored.
In order to reduce food waste, a study by Shashi, et al. (2018) emphasizes the value of cold chain management. The
researchers discovered that the food sector may dramatically increase the shelf
life of perishable goods and decrease losses due to rotting during transit and
storage by adopting effective temperature monitoring and control techniques.
Companies must make investments in temperature-controlled storage facilities,
refrigerated transportation, and temperature monitoring systems in order to
efficiently integrate cold chain management into corporate operations. IoT
sensors and data recorders can monitor temperature variations during storage
and transportation and warn supply chain management in real-time if
abnormalities take place (Shashi, et al. 2018). Automated
temperature control systems can modify cooling rates in accordance with product
needs, ensuring that the ideal conditions are always maintained.
Quality control, which includes thorough testing and
inspection of food products at various points throughout the supply chain, is
strongly related to cold chain management. Early in the production process,
quality checks can spot inferior items, keeping them off the market and away
from consumers. The quality and safety of products that are getting close to
their expiration dates can also be evaluated using quality control procedures.
Companies can perform quality testing to evaluate whether the products are
still safe for consumption rather than throwing out things as soon as they pass
their listed expiration date (Shashi, et al. 2018). This method
can increase the shelf life of goods and decrease waste that occurs too soon.
Businesses must set up thorough testing procedures and supply their facilities
with the tools and equipment required for product evaluation in order to
incorporate quality control efficiently. Regular audits and inspections may
guarantee that quality requirements are regularly satisfied, giving customers
and supply chain partners confidence (Gogou, Katsaros, Derens, Alvarez, & Taoukis, 2015).
Table 5:
frequency table for themes of RQ 5
|
Themes |
Frequency |
|
Theme 1 |
06 |
|
Theme 2 |
04 |
|
Results |
10 |
Figure 10:
Graph for table 5
As a result of improving inventory management, demand forecasting,
cold chain management, and quality control, effective supply chain tactics play
a critical role in decreasing food waste. Through cross-functional cooperation,
real-time data sharing, and investments in the proper technology and
infrastructure, these goals must be linked with business operations. The food
sector may significantly advance towards a more sustainable and effective food
supply chain by coordinating supply chain operations with waste reduction
objectives.
Chapter 5: Discussion
The research's objectives included investigating efficient methods for
reducing food waste in the global food industry, assessing current methods for
doing so in the food supply chain, recommending the use of technology for
innovation in the food industry's supply chain, and assessing supply chain
strategies for improving efficiency and lowering food waste. It is clear from
the analysis of secondary data and theme findings from the five study questions
that these aims have been met, and this conclusion is backed by pertinent
literature.
The adoption and implementation of initiatives to reduce food waste in
the food business were the subject of the first study question. The chosen
theme emphasised the initiatives taken by many stakeholders to address food
waste throughout the supply chain. The adoption of sustainable practises,
industry-wide commitments to reducing food waste, and corporate partnerships
with NGOs are all backed by the literature. The importance of technology in
enhancing supply chain logistics and inventory management for decreased food
waste was also emphasised (Ali et al., 2022; Martin-Rios et al., 2018).
Examples of this technology include IoT sensors and data analytics.
The second research topic looked at customer behaviour and knowledge on
reducing food waste. The thematic analysis showed that consumers are becoming
more aware of food waste and its effects on the environment. The use of social
media, internet platforms, influencers, and celebrities to spread awareness was
encouraged by literature. In order to promote sustainable practises, education
programmes and cooperation between consumers, producers, and businesses are
needed because there is a gap between awareness and behaviour change
(Martin-Rios et al., 2018; Morone et al., 2019).
The final research topic focused on how technology can help reduce food
waste. The theme emphasised the importance of enhanced monitoring, data
analytics, and traceability. IoT sensors, RFID tags, smart devices, and
blockchain have all been endorsed in the literature for real-time monitoring,
data-driven choices, better traceability, and transparency across the supply
chain. Additionally, it was determined that mobile applications could provide
users with the tools they need to make eco-friendly decisions (Annosi et al.,
2021; Yang et al., 2021).
The complexity and coordination of the supply chain were examined in the
fourth study question. Thematic analysis revealed that cooperation and
information exchange are crucial for effective food waste reduction. The importance
of supply chain collaboration, communication, and integration for waste
prevention was backed by the literature. Real-time data and cloud-based
platforms were also emphasised as tools for data-driven decision-making (Anders
et al., 2021; Cai & Yang, 2018).
The fifth study question looked at quality control, cold chain
management, demand forecasting, and inventory management. To reduce food waste,
the theme emphasised the significance of maintaining the proper balance between
inventory levels and precise demand predictions. In order to maintain product
freshness and minimise spoilage, literature has advocated the use of data
analytics and machine learning in demand forecasting as well as the integration
of cold chain management and quality control (Painter et al., 2016; Shashi et
al., 2018).
In conclusion, the answers to the five research questions show that the
goals of the study have been met and are well supported by the pertinent
literature. The food sector has made great efforts to reduce food waste by
implementing sustainable practises, utilising technology, and increasing
consumer awareness. Effective food waste reduction requires cooperation,
data-driven decision-making, and the use of cutting-edge technologies
throughout the supply chain. A more sustainable and ethical food industry also
requires addressing customer behaviour and views, as well as improving
inventory management and quality control. The global food sector can
significantly contribute to environmental sustainability, resource conservation,
and economic viability while combatting food waste by putting the highlighted
techniques and recommendations into practise.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the goal of this study was to examine and assess the
supply chain adoption of efficient methods for reducing food waste in the
global food business. A thorough understanding of food waste reduction methods
and practises was produced through the use of a qualitative methodology and
thematic analysis of secondary data from several research databases. The
study's findings made clear how important it is for stakeholders to work
together, implement new technology, and raise consumer knowledge in order to
reduce food waste in a sustainable and ethical manner. Two key themes were
found in the research. The first subject highlighted the numerous steps taken
by stakeholders, including food growers, manufacturers, retailers, and
policymakers, to adopt and execute programmes to reduce food waste. Food waste
has been found to be significantly decreased through programmes like
distribution of leftover food, adoption of "ugly produce" campaigns,
and technological developments in supply chain logistics. The significance of
sustainable practises in the food business has been further emphasised by collaborative
projects and industry-wide agreements. The second theme focused on how consumer
behaviour and awareness might help reduce food waste. Online platforms, social
media, and influencers have been found to be boosting consumer awareness of
food waste and its effects on the environment. However, there is a need to
close the knowledge-behavior gap, which calls for targeted education and
cooperation between consumers, producers, and retailers.
The study also emphasised the value of sophisticated surveillance, data analytics,
traceability, and transparency in lowering food waste. As important
technologies that can improve the effectiveness of the supply chain and
consumer decision-making, IoT sensors, RFID tags, smart devices, blockchain,
and mobile applications have been identified. The study also emphasised the
significance of supply chain cooperation and complexity in putting into
practise successful food waste reduction initiatives. Waste minimization and
effective supply chain operations were shown to require collaboration,
communication, and integration of data-driven decision-making. Additionally,
crucial supply chain strategies to reduce food waste were identified, including
inventory management, demand forecasting, cold chain management, and quality
control. A reduction in both overstocking and understocking can be achieved by
using accurate demand forecasting, which is made possible by data analytics and
machine learning. It was discovered that maintaining the cold chain and quality
control helped keep products fresh and minimised spoiling.
Recommendations for Additional Study:
To evaluate the long-term effects of programmes to reduce food waste in
the food business, future research should concentrate on longitudinal studies.
Understanding the longevity and efficiency of diverse practises through time
would be made easier by this. Furthermore, cross-regional and cross-national
comparisons can shed light on how cultural, economic, and governmental issues
affect practises for reducing food waste. It is possible to develop more
individualised and efficient tactics by being aware of these environmental
variations. Future studies might also look into the potential of cutting-edge
technology like artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and blockchain
in tackling the problems associated with food waste. Examining how to
incorporate these technologies into current supply chain management systems may
reveal new opportunities for waste reduction and transparency. Additionally,
qualitative research can help to better understand the obstacles to and drivers
of behaviour change by delving deeper into consumer behaviour and perceptions
towards food waste. This might help focus interventions and educational
initiatives to cut down on family food waste.
References
Ali, S. M., Moktadir, M. A., Kabir, G., Chakma, J.,
Rumi, M. J. U., & Islam, M. T. (2019). Framework for evaluating risks in
food supply chain: Implications in food wastage reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 786-800.
Ali, Y., Jokhio, D. H.,
Dojki, A. A., Rehman, O. U., Khan, F., & Salman, A. (2022). Adoption of
circular economy for food waste management in the context of a developing
country. Waste Management & Research, 40(6),
676-684.
Amani, P., Lindbom, I., Sundström, B., &
Östergren, K. (2015). Green-lean synergy-root-cause analysis in food waste
prevention. International Journal on Food
System Dynamics, 6(1012-2016-81250), 99-109.
Anders, S., Cowling,
W., Pareek, A., Gupta, K. J., Singla-Pareek, S. L., & Foyer, C. H. (2021).
Gaining acceptance of novel plant breeding technologies. Trends in
Plant Science, 26(6), 575-587.
Annosi, M. C.,
Brunetta, F., Bimbo, F., & Kostoula, M. (2021). Digitalization within food
supply chains to prevent food waste. Drivers, barriers and collaboration
practices. Industrial Marketing Management, 93,
208-220.
Avramenko,
O. (2018, February 2). Contribute to a better world = Be a successful company.
Sustainability in a shared-economy startup. Medium. https://medium.com/@Anaiska/contribute-to-a-better-world-be-a-successful-company-sustainability-in-a-shared-economy-startup-50cc72f2e37b
Bhargava, N., Sharanagat, V.S., Mor,
R.S. and Kumar, K., 2020. Active and intelligent biodegradable packaging films
using food and food waste-derived bioactive compounds: A review. Trends
in Food Science & Technology, 105, pp.385-401.
Bosona, T., &
Gebresenbet, G. (2018). Swedish consumers’ perception of food quality and
sustainability in relation to organic food production. Foods, 7(4),
54.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2019. Reflecting on
reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise
and health, 11(4), pp.589-597.
Chauhan, C., Dhir, A., Akram, M.U. and Salo,
J., 2021. Food loss and waste in food supply chains. A systematic literature
review and framework development approach. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 295, p.126438.
Curran, M. A. (2013). Life cycle assessment: a review
of the methodology and its application to sustainability. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2(3), 273-277.
Del Borghi, A., Moreschi, L., & Gallo, M. (2020).
Circular economy approach to reduce water–energy–food nexus. Current Opinion in Environmental Science
& Health, 13, 23-28.
Despoudi, S., Bucatariu, C., Otles, S., & Kartal,
C. (2021). Food waste management, valorization, and sustainability in the food
industry Food waste recovery (pp.
3-19): Elsevier.
Gogou, E., Katsaros, G.,
Derens, E., Alvarez, G., & Taoukis, P. S. (2015). Cold chain database
development and application as a tool for the cold chain management and food
quality evaluation. International Journal of Refrigeration, 52,
109-121.
Greenly, (2022), Global Food Waste
in 2023 - Greenly Earth https://greenly.earth/en-us/blog/ecology-news/global-food-waste-in-2022#:~:text=Over%20a%20third%20of%20all,food%20is%20worth%20%24230%20billion.
Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., & Guinée, J. B. (2010).
Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and
technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle
analysis. Polymer degradation and
stability, 95(3), 422-428.
Hodgkins, S., Rundle-Thiele, S., Knox, K., & Kim,
J. (2019). Utilising stakeholder theory for social marketing process evaluation
in a food waste context. Journal of
Social Marketing, 9(3), 270-287.
Kiger, M.E. and Varpio, L., 2020. Thematic
analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8),
pp.846-854.
Krishnan, R., Agarwal, R., Bajada, C. and
Arshinder, K., 2020. Redesigning a food supply chain for environmental
sustainability–An analysis of resource use and recovery. Journal of
cleaner production, 242, p.118374.
Kumar, M., Sharma, M., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K.,
& Choubey, V. K. (2022). Performance assessment of circular driven
sustainable agri-food supply chain towards achieving sustainable consumption
and production. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 372, 133698.
Lazarova,
Meglena & Sapundzhi, Fatima. (2023). Stochastic Modeling with Applications
in Supply Chain Management and ICT Systems. Computation. 11. 21.
10.3390/computation11020021.
Mak, T.M., Xiong, X., Tsang, D.C., Iris,
K.M. and Poon, C.S., 2020. Sustainable food waste management towards circular
bioeconomy: Policy review, limitations and opportunities. Bioresource
technology, 297, p.122497.
Mardani, A., Kannan, D., Hooker, R.E., Ozkul,
S., Alrasheedi, M. and Tirkolaee, E.B., 2020. Evaluation of green and
sustainable supply chain management using structural equation modelling: A
systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for
future research. Journal of cleaner production, 249,
p.119383.
Martin-Rios, C.,
Demen-Meier, C., Gössling, S., & Cornuz, C. (2018). Food waste management
innovations in the foodservice industry. Waste management, 79,
196-206.
Martin-Rios, C.,
Hofmann, A., & Mackenzie, N. (2020). Sustainability-oriented innovations in
food waste management technology. Sustainability, 13(1),
210.
Mayer, I. (2015). Qualitative research with a focus on
qualitative data analysis. International
Journal of Sales, Retailing & Marketing, 4(9), 53-67.
Melnikovas, A. (2018). Towards an Explicit Research
Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies. Journal of futures Studies, 23(2).
Morone, P., Koutinas,
A., Gathergood, N., Arshadi, M., & Matharu, A. (2019). Food waste:
Challenges and opportunities for enhancing the emerging bio-economy. Journal
of cleaner production, 221, 10-16.
Nadeau, N., & Koebele, E. A. (2023). Collaborating
to reduce food waste: building collaborative advantage in local food systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 38,
e32.
Ojha, S., Bußler, S. and Schlüter, O.K., 2020.
Food waste valorisation and circular economy concepts in insect production and
processing. Waste Management, 118, pp.600-609.
Otles, S., Despoudi, S., Bucatariu, C., & Kartal,
C. (2015). Food waste management, valorization, and sustainability in the food
industry Food waste recovery (pp.
3-23): Elsevier.
Painter, K.,
Thondhlana, G., & Kua, H. W. (2016). Food waste generation and potential
interventions at Rhodes University, South Africa. Waste Management, 56,
491-497.
Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., Steinberger, J. K.,
Wright, N., & bin Ujang, Z. (2014). The food waste hierarchy as a framework
for the management of food surplus and food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 106-115.
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S.
(2010). Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for
change to 2050. Philosophical transactions
of the royal society B: biological sciences, 365(1554), 3065-3081.
Powell, D., Lundeby, S., Chabada, L., & Dreyer, H.
(2017). Lean Six Sigma and environmental sustainability: the case of a
Norwegian dairy producer. International
Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(1), 53-64.
Read, Q.D., Brown, S., Cuéllar, A.D., Finn,
S.M., Gephart, J.A., Marston, L.T., Meyer, E., Weitz, K.A. and Muth, M.K.,
2020. Assessing the environmental impacts of halving food loss and waste along
the food supply chain. Science of the Total Environment, 712,
p.136255.
Reynolds, C., Goucher,
L., Quested, T., Bromley, S., Gillick, S., Wells, V. K., ... & Jackson, P.
(2019). Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions–What works and how
to design better interventions. Food policy, 83, 7-27.
Roy, V., Schoenherr, T., & Charan, P. (2018). The
thematic landscape of literature in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM):
A review of the principal facets in SSCM development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(4),
1091-1124.
Sahay, A. (2016). Peeling Saunder's research onion. Research Gate, Art, 3(2), 1-5.
Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., &
Bristow, A. (2015). Understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory
development.
Schanes, K., Dobernig,
K., & Gözet, B. (2018). Food waste matters-A systematic review of household
food waste practices and their policy implications. Journal of cleaner
production, 182, 978-991.
Shashi, S., Cerchione,
R., Singh, R., Centobelli, P., & Shabani, A. (2018). Food cold chain
management: From a structured literature review to a conceptual framework and
research agenda. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(3),
792-821.
Singh, S., & Srivastava, S. K. (2022). Decision
support framework for integrating triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability in
agriculture supply chain. Sustainability
Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(2), 387-413.
Social
Accountability International. (2023, May 26). Triple Bottom Line (TBL)
Certification - SAI. SAI. https://sa-intl.org/programs/tbl/
Svensson, G. (2007). Aspects of sustainable supply
chain management (SSCM): conceptual framework and empirical example. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,
12(4), 262-266.
Tanveer, U., Ishaq, S., & Gough, A. (2021).
Circular Economy in Agri-Food Sector: Food Waste Management Perspective. Challenges and Opportunities of Circular
Economy in Agri-Food Sector: Rethinking Waste, 55-75.
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V.
(2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE
handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2, 17-37.
Xie, Y., & Breen, L. (2014). Who cares wins? A
comparative analysis of household waste medicines and batteries reverse
logistics systems: The case of the NHS (UK). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 455-474.
Yang, X., Li, M., Yu,
H., Wang, M., Xu, D., & Sun, C. (2021). A trusted blockchain-based
traceability system for fruit and vegetable agricultural products. IEEE
Access, 9, 36282-36293.
15
Writers. (2023). Guide to Understanding the Research Onion | 15 Writers. 15
Writers. https://15writers.com/research-onion/
Appendix A:
Codes
for research question 1
Codes
for Theme 1: Adoption and Implementation of Food Waste Reduction Initiatives in
the Food Industry
1. SURPLUS-REDIST
2. UGLY-PRODUCE
3. INVENTORY-MGMT
4. SUPPLY-CHAIN-LOG
5. IOT-DATA-ANALYTICS
6. PARTNERSHIPS-COLLAB
7. SDG-12.3-REDUCTION
Codes
for Theme 2: Consumer Behaviour and Awareness in Food Waste Reduction
1. CONSCIOUSNESS-AWARE
2. SUSTAIN-ETHICAL-FOOD
3. SOCIAL-MEDIA-AWARE
4. OVERPURCHASING-WASTE
5. FOOD-STORAGE-PRACTICES
6. MINDFUL-SHOPPING-HABITS
7. COMMUNITY-DRIVEN-REDUCTION
Appendix B:
Codes
for research question 2
Codes
for Theme 1: Environmental Sustainability and Resource Conservation
1. ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT
2. GREENHOUSE-GAS-EMISSIONS
3. CLIMATE-CHANGE
4. LANDFILL-DECOMPOSITION
5. RESOURCE-UTILIZATION
6. WATER-CONSERVATION
7. ENERGY-EFFICIENCY
8. ECOLOGICAL-FOOTPRINT
9. NATURAL-RESOURCE-PRESERVATION
10. ECOSYSTEM-HEALTH
Codes
for Theme 2: Economic Viability and Competitiveness
1. FINANCIAL-SAVINGS
2. COST-EFFICIENCY
3. OPERATIONAL-OPTIMIZATION
4. BRAND-LOYALTY
5. MARKET-SHARE
6. RESPONSIBLE-INVESTMENTS
7. SUSTAINABLE-BUSINESS-PRACTICES
8. ESG-FACTORS
9. INNOVATION-INVESTMENT
10. ECO-FRIENDLY-PRODUCTS
Appendix C:
Codes
for research question 3
Codes
for Theme 1: Advanced Monitoring and Data Analytics for Waste Reduction
1. IoT-SENSORS
2. RFID-TECHNOLOGY
3. SMART-DEVICES
4. REAL-TIME-MONITORING
5. DATA-ANALYTICS
6. INVENTORY-OPTIMIZATION
7. DEMAND-FORECASTING
8. AI-APPLICATIONS
9. MACHINE-LEARNING
10. PRODUCTION-SCHEDULES
11. INEFFICIENCY-IDENTIFICATION
12. FORECASTING-ACCURACY
Codes
for Theme 2: Traceability and Transparency for Improved Food Waste Management
1. BLOCKCHAIN-TECHNOLOGY
2. TRANSPARENT-LEDGER
3. SUPPLY-CHAIN-TRACEABILITY
4. ORIGIN-TRACKING
5. FOOD-PRODUCT-INFORMATION
6. CONSUMER-TRUST
7. EFFICIENT-RECALLS
8. FOOD-SAFETY-ISSUES
9. DATA-SHARING-COLLAB
10. MOBILE-APPLICATIONS
11. SUSTAINABLE-CHOICES
12. HOUSEHOLD-FOOD-WASTE
Appendix D:
Codes
for research question 4
Codes
for Theme 1: Supply Chain Complexity and Coordination
1. SUPPLY-CHAIN-COMPLEXITY
2. MULTIPLE-STAKEHOLDERS
3. INEFFICIENT-COMMUNICATION
4. LACK-OF-INFORMATION-SHARING
5. OVERPRODUCTION
6. INACCURATE-DEMAND-FORECASTING
7. DELAYS-IN-DISTRIBUTION
8. MULTIPLE-HANDLING-PROCESSES
9. QUALITY-DEGRADATION
10. SPOILAGE-DURING-TRANSPORTATION
11. DATA-DRIVEN-SUPPLY-CHAIN
Codes
for Theme 2: Consumer Behavior and Perceptions
1. CONSUMER-BEHAVIOR
2. FOOD-WASTE-CONTRIBUTORS
3. MISCONCEPTIONS-EXPIRATION-DATES
4. BULK-PURCHASING-HABITS
5. AESTHETIC-STANDARDS
6. IMPERFECT-PRODUCE-REJECTION
7. TARGETED-EDUCATION-CAMPAIGNS
8. PRACTICAL-TIPS-REDUCING-WASTE
9. RETAILER-CUSTOMER-COLLABORATION
10. FOOD-SAFETY-AWARENESS
11. INFORMED-CONSUMER-DECISIONS
Appendix E:
Codes
for research question 5
Codes
for Theme 1: Inventory Management and Demand Forecasting
1. INVENTORY-OPTIMIZATION
2. OVERSTOCKING-PREVENTION
3. EXPIRATION-DATES
4. UNDERSTOCKING-MINIMIZATION
5. DEMAND-FORECASTING
6. DATA-ANALYTICS
7. HISTORICAL-SALES-DATA
8. MARKET-TRENDS
9. CONSUMER-PREFERENCES
10. MACHINE-LEARNING-ALGORITHMS
11. SUPPLY-CHAIN-COORDINATION
12. PRODUCTION-SCHEDULES
13. REAL-TIME-DATA-SHARING
14. CLOUD-BASED-PLATFORMS
Codes
for Theme 2: Cold Chain Management and Quality Control
1. COLD-CHAIN-MANAGEMENT
2. TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED-ENVIRONMENT
3. PERISHABLE-GOODS
4. SHELF-LIFE-EXTENSION
5. TEMPERATURE-MONITORING
6. REFRIGERATED-TRANSPORTATION
7. IOT-SENSORS
8. REAL-TIME-ALERTS
9. AUTOMATED-TEMPERATURE-CONTROL
10. QUALITY-CONTROL
11. FOOD-PRODUCT-INSPECTION
12. EXPIRATION-DATE-ASSESSMENT
13. SHELF-LIFE-EXTENSION
14. QUALITY-STANDARDS
Comments